top of page
Logotipo de la Ley de Bebidas Alcohólicas

Florida’s New Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act

white-background.png

30 de septiembre de 2020

1 minute read

sequor-logo-newsletter.png

Daniel M. Coyle

Florida’s New Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act 


By Daniel Coyle 


In July, Florida became the ninth state to adopt the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act (“UCRERA”).


The timing could not be better, given the near-universal prediction that defaults on commercial loans will skyrocket due to the COVID-19 pandemic once foreclosure moratoriums end and the growing suspicion that many borrowers will not reflexively file for bankruptcy. Those with experience as federal equity receivers and Chapter 7 trustees will find they are well suited to creatively and effectively use the greater powers receivers enjoy under UCRERA to achieve better and more fruitful outcomes. 


Drafted in 2019 by the Uniform Law Commission, UCRERA significantly broadens the powers of state receivers of commercial real property while also establishing a standard set of rules governing the reasons authorizing appointment and the procedures for seeking appointment.2 UCRERA’s passage is a welcome event for receivers, trustees, fiduciaries, lenders and other parties involved with commercial real estate along with their counsel. 

This article will analyze Florida’s UCRERA as well as to point out some key differences between Florida’s version and the Model Act. 



I. Florida’s Receivership Scheme Prior to UCRERA 


In Florida, prior to UCRERA’s enactment, receivers were generally appointed as an equitable remedy to preserve the status quo of the real estate and to collect the rents and profits.3 Appointment was difficult to obtain because: (1) it was in derogation of the common law, and; (2) it divested the property owner of the owner’s right to manage and control the property.4 Consistently with this, the applicant also had to meet a high burden by demonstrating a serious and significant ongoing loss, usually, but not always, in the form of waste, even if the applicant had a right to appointment in a mortgage.5 The waste could take the form of ongoing damage or disrepair of the real property, failing to pay property taxes, or failure to turn over rents.


Once appointed, the ultimate rights, duties and liabilities of the receiver were solely determined from the language of the order of appointment. In other words, they were left completely up to the court. One might think this discretion could result in robust powers but case law curtailed these powers significantly. For instance, it was improbable, if not impossible, to obtain an appointment order empowering the receiver to sell the real property7 because appointment does not affect the title to property or deprive the owner of rights to the property.8 Instead, receivers were limited to managing the property in the ordinary course of business. 



II. UCRERA’s Scheme 

A. The Receiver’s Powers under UCRERA 


UCRERA broadens the powers of a receiver significantly, to the degree that the receiver obtains many of the same powers as a Chapter 7 trustee in bankruptcy. 


The receiver is given the status of lien creditor under Florida’s recording statute chapter (Ch. 695 Fla. Stat.) and Florida’s enactment of the UCC pertaining to secured transactions (Ch. 679 Fla. Stat.), similarly to 11 U.S.C. §544 as to receivership property or fixtures.9 Thus, the receiver may now pursue avoidance/clawback actions regarding the property as a Chapter 7 Trustee or Debtor-in-Possession would.10 Similarly to 11 U.S.C. §542, the receiver is entitled to turnover of receivership property. Persons owing debts that constitute receivership property must pay those debts to the receiver.11 


One of the most significant improvements is that the receiver is authorized to sell the property before or after judgment. The receiver is now authorized to sell the receivership assets outside of the ordinary course of business before judgment and with the approval of the owners,12 or after judgment and with court approval13, much like the bankruptcy process under 11 U.S.C. §365. As in a bankruptcy “363 sale,” this is a sale of the asset “free and clear” of liens on the property, with the liens attaching to the proceeds.14 Good faith purchasers are protected from reversal or modification on appeal of an order approving the sale.15 


The receiver also has the power to accept or reject executory contracts relating to the property with court approval.16 This power may be used even if the appointment of the receiver constitutes a breach under the contract.17 Also, the receiver's performance of an executory contract before court approval of its adoption or rejection does not preclude the receiver from later seeking approval to reject the contract.18 


Similarly to a section 362 stay in bankruptcy, the court may enter an order providing for a stay of acts relating to the property to protect against misappropriate or waste.19 This order must describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained.20 

With court approval, the receiver may incur debt outside of the ordinary course of business, make improvements to the receivership property, make a distribution of receivership property, and take the other actions described above regarding selling the property, adopting or rejecting executory contracts.21 


In addition to those innovative provisions, the receiver also has the more typical powers to collect, control, manage and perfect the property, operate the business, incur unsecured debt and pay expenses in the ordinary course of business, assert rights, claims and defenses relating to the property, and engage professionals.22 


Regarding its duties, the receiver must prepare and retain appropriate records, including a record of each receipt, disbursement and disposition of the property, account for the proceeds of all dispositions, file a copy of the order of appointment and disclose any fact arising which would 

3 | P a g e 

The receiver’s powers and duties may be expanded, modified or limited by court order.

disqualify the receiver.23The receiver’s powers and duties may be expanded, modified or limitedby court order.24


To further the goal of standardization of appointments and broaden the receiver’s powers,UCRERA contains two provisions that seek to homogenize processesacross state lines. The courtmay appoint a receiver already appointed in another state or even the nominee of that receiver, asan ancillary receiver of property located within the state, so long as the person would beeligiblefor appointment under the standards of UCRERA.25The ancillary receiverhas the same rights,powers and duties as a receiver appointed under the statute.26Additionally, the Court maydomesticate an orderentered in another state appointing or directing areceiver.27The Act alsoprovides that decisions of other states interpreting UCRERA’s provisions are persuasiveauthority.28


Acourt may award areceiver the reasonable and necessaryfees and expenses ofperformingitsduties and exercising thereceiver’spowersfromrevenue generated by theproperty.29Or, the court mayorder either the person who requested appointment or the personwhose conduct justified appointment, to pay the reasonable and necessary fees and expenses of thereceivership.30



B. Sufficient Cause for Appointment


UCRERAprovidesgrounds authorizing appointment prior to a judgment and groundsauthorizing appointment after entry ofajudgment.31A court may appoint a receiverbeforejudgmentif the property or itsrevenue producing potential: (1) is subjectedto waste, loss,substantial diminution invalue, dissipation or impairment or (2) has been,or is about to be,thesubject of a voidable transaction.32After judgment, a court may appoint a receiver:(a) to effectuatethe judgmentor;(b) preserve theproperty pending appeal orwhen an execution hasbeen returned unsatisfied and the owner refuses to apply the property in satisfaction of thejudgment.33


UCRERAalsoprovides a non-exhaustive list offactors to beconsidered in ruling on arequest for appointment based upon a mortgage, which include many of the same themes discussedpreviously (e.g., protection from waste, loss, diminutionin value, etc.).



C. Procedure for Appointment


TheFloridaprovision governing appointments34was significantly augmented from theModel Act because the Florida Rule of Civil Procedure governing appointmentsprovidessignificant due process protections with whichFlorida’s version ofUCRERAhad to harmonize.Appointment requiresnotice and opportunityfor hearing,except thatthe court may issue an orderwithout notice if immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result tothe applicantor that waste, dissipation, impairment, or substantial diminution in valuewill result beforeany adverse party can be heard.35


The person seeking appointment without prior notice or hearing must providesecurity forthe payment of damages, reasonableattorney fees, and costs incurred or suffered by any person ifthe court laterconcludesthat the appointment was not justified.36


ENDNOTES 


1 Oregon, Utah, Nevada, Tennessee, Michigan, Arizona, Maryland, and North Carolina are the others. Connecticut has introduced a bill to enact the law. 


2 According to section 714.04(1), UCRERA applies to a receivership initiated in a court of Florida for an interest in real property and any incidental personal property related to or used in operating the real property. The insertion of the term “incidental” was to make clear that the Act does not apply to personal property, broadly, but instead only to personal property connected with or associated with commercial real property (e.g., fixtures). Property is defined broadly and expansively in section 714.02(13) to include all “right, title and interest, legal and equitable … and includes proceeds, products, offspring, rets and profits.” 


3 U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Cramer, 113 So. 3d 1020, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). 


4 Twinjay Chambers P'ship v. Suarez, 556 So. 2d 781, 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). 


5 Boyd v. Banc One Mortg. Corp., 509 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). 


6 Smith v. State Life Insurance Company, 153 So. 842 (1934); Smith v. DuPuis, 157 So. 491 (1934); (Carr v. Marion Mortg. Co., 128 So. 12 (1930). 


7 See, e.g., Shubh Hotels Boca, LLC v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 46 So. 3d 163, 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). 


8 Eppes v. Dade Developers Inc., 170 So. 875 (1936). 


9 Fla. Stat. §714.09. 


III. Conclusion 


UCRERA is a significant and welcome step in both standardizing the rights, powers, duties and procedures related to state receivers of commercial real property. With the moratoriums on foreclosures in multiple states ending or coming to an end, and the expected increase in commercial loan defaults, Florida’s enactment of UCRERA is timely, and more states should consider passing their own versions of the Act. 


END 


About the Author


Daniel Coyle is an attorney with Sequor Law in Miami. His practice focuses on bankruptcy, creditors’ rights, secured transactions, collections, executions, asset recovery and cross-border insolvency. dcoyle@sequorlaw.com 



10 One limitation to this is that under Fla. Stat. §714.10, appointment does not affect the validity of a pre-receivership perfected security interest or property acquired post-receivership under a perfected floating lien. 


11 Fla. Stat. §714.11. 

12 Fla. Stat. §714.16(2). 

13 Fla. Stat. §714.16(3). 

14 Fla. Stat. §714.16(4). 

15 Fla. Stat. §714.16(6). 

16 Fla. Stat. §714.17. 

17 Fla. Stat. § 714.16(4). 

18 Fla. Stat. §714.17(3). Also, under Fla. Stat. §714.17(5), if the executory contract is rejected, it is treated as if it were breached as of the day before the date the receiver was appointed so that the aggrieved party may assert rejection damages against the receivership estate. 

19 Fla. Stat. §714.14. 

20 Fla. Stat. §714.14(3). The permissive nature of this stay and the description requirements in the order are different than the Model Act, which provides that the appointment automatically provides for a such a stay. A person affected may apply for relief from the stay and the court must hear the motion within five (5) days or at such time as the court determines is reasonable and appropriate. Fla. Stat. §714.14(4). 

21 Fla. Stat. §714.12(2). 

22 Fla. Stat. §714.12(1). 

23 Fla. Stat. §714.12(3). 

24 Fla. Stat. §714.12(4). 

25 Fla. Stat. §714.24(1)(a). 

26 Fla. Stat. §714.24(3). 

27 Fla. Stat. §714.24(2). 

28 Fla. Stat. §714.26. 

6 | P a g e 

29 Fla. Stat. §714.21(1). 

30 Fla. Stat. §714.21(2). 

31 Fla. Stat. §714.06. 

32 Fla. Sta. §714.06(1)(a). 

33 Fla. Sta. §714.06(1)(b). 

34 Fla. Stat. §714.03. 

35 Fla. Stat. §714.03(2). 

36 Fla. Stat. §714.06. Subsection 714.06(3) also provides that, if and when the Court determines the appointment was justified, and the order of appointment becomes final and no longer subject to appeal, the court will release the bond or other security.  

Últimas Noticias & Perspectivas

9 may 2026

2 minutes read

Attorney Spotlight – Get to Know Michael Hanlon

1. What inspired you to pursue a law career? I was less drawn to law in the abstract and more..

11 abr 2026

2 minutes read

Sequor Law Celebrates National Pet Day with Continued Support of Paws4You Rescue

In recognition of National Pet Day, Sequor Law is proud to continue its support of Paws4You Rescue, a Miami-based nonprofit...

29 ene 2026

2 minutes read

Attorney Spotlight – Get to Know Alain M. Acanda

1. What inspired you to pursue a law career? I was inspired to pursue a career in the law after having negative experiences with the law as.

13 ene 2026

2 minutes read

Sequor Law Expands Washington, D.C. Office with Addition of David Short

Sequor Law expands its Washington, D.C. office with the addition of David Short, strengthening its cross-border litigation, asset recovery.

bottom of page